Zara Retailing Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Zara Retailing Analysis - Essay ExampleKey militant favor Among of Zaras competitive returns are its manpower and human resource management. It is noted that 80% of its employees were engaged in retail sales in stores and 8.5% were involved in manufacturing, design, logistics, distribution, and the remaining were part of headquarters activities. This only implies that Zara is good at optimizing its full operation especially on its supply chain management. Zara is also aggressive in its expansion broadcast ingesting that 80% of its capital expenditures is appropriated to new store openings, 19% on refurbishing and 10% on logistics. This is one of its competitive advantages because its renowned external competitors are not that aggressive in their expansion program. Zara is also known to consider great savings on employment. It tries to gain more in its manpower expenses by choosing personnel with firm experience in the clothing industry but with a relatively cheap labor. This i s one of the reasons wherefore Zara is generating much competitive income in its operations compared to its competitors. The three international leading competitors of Zara are the Gap from the unify States, Hennes & Mauritz from Sweden, and Be wageton from Italy. Geographically speaking, it is an advantage for Zara because apparel disposal in 2000 is higher in Europe which is 34%, and followed by the United States which is 29% and in Asia which is 23% (Case 32 Zara Fast fashion). Zara is based in Europe and this is an advantage on its part because of its proximity in the profitable market for apparel in the world. The proximity is an advantage because this has something to do with other strategic advantage when it comes to culture and understanding customers necessitate at the deepest level. In fact, it is in line with this that Zara has continuous innovation based on customers desires. Inditexts financial comparison Shown in Table 1 are some of the indicators of the financial p erformance of Inditex, Be lastton, H&M, and Gap. Gap has the highest net in operation(p) revenue among the three other retailing companies which is an indication that it may all has more retail outlets than the other or it is really at its best in stimulating needs or demand for its product offerings. Next to Gap is H&M followed by Inditex and finally Benetton. The net revenue can be an indication of market share and in this case, Inditex is not far easy the Gap and H&M. The same trend goes on from gross profit margin until operating efficiency. The operating efficiency is the operating expenses as a percentage of net operating revenues. The above indicators are not enough to tell which among of the four companies have higher profitability. When it comes to profitability, Inditex is more profitable compared to Gap, H&M and Benetton. Inditex has 10.5% net profit margin which is an indication that it has substantially generated more profits. This is the effect of maximizing its ope ration and resources. In fact, its PPE (property, works and equipment) as percentage of net operating revenue is also higher than the other retailing companies. This is some other indication that Inditex has substantially maximized its operation and resources to the fullest compared to the other retailing companies. Table 1. Financial performance of Inditex and its three international competitors in operation(p) results ( Millions) Gap H&M Benetton Inditex Net operating revenue 15,559 4,269 2,098 3,250 Gross margin 4,656 2,204 909 1,687 Operating efficiency 27.4% 37.8% 29.7% 30.2% Net profit margin -0.05% 9.6% 7.1% 10.5% PPE (% of net operating revenue 30.2% 15.9% 34.3% 37.8% Zaras fast chemical reaction model Zaras fast response model contributes to its competitive advantage. The market for young